These chuckleheads probably don’t even know what this research entails but banning it makes their dimwitted followers excited. The state of the US right now is shameful.
thats the point. nobody knows how it all works, and by the time you think you do you youve killed people with it.
these attempts to play god always fall prey to the most basic sins. just because someone says they “want to do good” doesnt mean they effecticely can. humans cannot handle the power.
i dont believe in trading lives just so we can fund research grants.
We know enough about how it works to make it safe, and everything else that we don't know, we learn through the process, to the benefit of our future as a species.
The name-calling and derogating in this thread is surprising and disappointing.
For more than a decade, a substantial chorus of the world's foremost experts in the relevant disciplines have been calling for an end to gain-of-function research. This isn't some sudden trend, or a misinformed knee-jerk reaction.
This is the result of patient deliberation and research building an irrefutable case, which has made convincing empirical inroads unto near academic consensus.
To refer to organizations like Cambridge WG as "chuckleheads" is really beneath what I hope is our standard on HN.
If you haven't already, I suggest thumbing through this abbreviated list of publications and reports, and look at the pre-COVID19 warnings issued by researchers at every elite institution of medical research in the world:
Federal officials in 2014 paused 18 projects before releasing 2017 guidelines that allowed work to move forward. But the debate flared again during the COVID-19 pandemic, when some scientists and Republican politicians, including Trump, alleged that the
coronavirus responsible came from GOF work at a lab in Wuhan, China,
don't worry dismayed scientists, there are other paths of viral and microbial research you can focus on that can help humanity just as much if not more
Yes, let's all just change our career specialty every time the fascist cultists set their goldfish-level attention on another anti-intellectual "evil" that some lead-poisoned radio personality told them to get their anger fix from while shelling out supplements. A perfectly reasonable way to do science.
These chuckleheads probably don’t even know what this research entails but banning it makes their dimwitted followers excited. The state of the US right now is shameful.
thats the point. nobody knows how it all works, and by the time you think you do you youve killed people with it.
these attempts to play god always fall prey to the most basic sins. just because someone says they “want to do good” doesnt mean they effecticely can. humans cannot handle the power.
i dont believe in trading lives just so we can fund research grants.
We know enough about how it works to make it safe, and everything else that we don't know, we learn through the process, to the benefit of our future as a species.
No, you dont. you cant know its safe. youre just repeating phrases from popular media.
I hope for consistency's you never take an antibiotic. Never take a vaccine. Never take any pharmaceutical drug. Don't want anyone "playing god"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain-of-function_research
A good reference article.
The name-calling and derogating in this thread is surprising and disappointing.
For more than a decade, a substantial chorus of the world's foremost experts in the relevant disciplines have been calling for an end to gain-of-function research. This isn't some sudden trend, or a misinformed knee-jerk reaction.
This is the result of patient deliberation and research building an irrefutable case, which has made convincing empirical inroads unto near academic consensus.
To refer to organizations like Cambridge WG as "chuckleheads" is really beneath what I hope is our standard on HN.
If you haven't already, I suggest thumbing through this abbreviated list of publications and reports, and look at the pre-COVID19 warnings issued by researchers at every elite institution of medical research in the world:
https://www.cambridgeworkinggroup.org/pubs.html
Federal officials in 2014 paused 18 projects before releasing 2017 guidelines that allowed work to move forward. But the debate flared again during the COVID-19 pandemic, when some scientists and Republican politicians, including Trump, alleged that the
coronavirus responsible came from GOF work at a lab in Wuhan, China,
that had received NIH funding.
Regarding: "coronavirus responsible came from GOF work at a lab in Wuhan, China,", Please do not post opinion as fact.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_SARS-CoV-2 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373617/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406950/
don't worry dismayed scientists, there are other paths of viral and microbial research you can focus on that can help humanity just as much if not more
Yes, let's all just change our career specialty every time the fascist cultists set their goldfish-level attention on another anti-intellectual "evil" that some lead-poisoned radio personality told them to get their anger fix from while shelling out supplements. A perfectly reasonable way to do science.
You mean miasma research?
I wish the Democrats did borderline evil things like deny healthcare to people that supported a party that is anti science.